هل انا حامل؟ وخطأ المنجم جون فراولي
هذه هيئة اعترف فيها المنجم بخطئه وصعوبة بعض الهيئات
جائته تسال عن هل هي حامل فاجاب بالايجاب لكن تبين عدم حملها وتم اجراء عملية رفع كيس منها ثم حملت .
الهيئة واضحة بانها موجبة لكن اين يكمن الخطأ ؟ . وهي لمن اراد التفاعل
ذكر المنجم جون فراولي الاتي
This is a true case where the astrologer was asked "Am I pregnant?" as the querent tried to conceive the previous night. What does John Frawley have to say about this? I quote from his book The Horary Textbook: "The clearest and strongest testimony is finding Lord 5 in the 1st house, close to the Ascendant. This gives a clear picture of the baby (Lord 5) inside the mother and is a definite Yes. With so clear a picture of the situation, we do not need an aspect linking the mother and the baby". In this case, we have exactly that. Lord 5 (Mars) in the 1st house. We need not, therefore, look any further. But let's be virgoan about this and pretend that we are not completely satisfied by Mars's placement almost 13 degrees away from the Ascendant, which is not what John Frawley would call close. The Moon (querent) is in the 10th house in Pisces and is just separating from a trine to Mars. We would interpret that as the event having already happened. So we have Mars in the 1st house, trining the Moon, with both significators in the most fertile of all signs. What more could we want? Yet, the querent was NOT pregnant and she had to undergo an operation to remove a cyst that prevented conception.